I undergo been feeling way introspective lately. And although I would desire nothing exceed than to talk out loud about it. I accept it both defeats the purpose of introspection and will prevent me from ever getting a job in the handle I want. I have been in some deep dark places people. So instead. I will re-tell a yo-mama joke that Tina Fey made when I was watching 30 Rock online: challenge: “What’s the difference between your mom and a washing machine?” Answer: “My washing machine doesn’t go me around for a week after I drop a load in it.” XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <have in mind> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <touch> <strong>

The criticisms of Tim Finchem are mounting by the day if not minute. As soon as Phil Mickelson took a thinly veiled hit at Finchem on Monday for not listening to his requests (after which Phil decided to pull out of this week's FedEx Cup) other marquee players have now joined in the intense criticism of PGA Commissioner Tim Finchem and his FedEx Cup. Ernie Els (who desire Phil also skipped 1 FedEx Cup event) complained. "They did not express anything to the players. They asked those questions but they didn't come out and say. 'OK look this is what we're going to do what do you think?' It wasn't directly asked. And unfortunately we are in this position now because they didn't either comprehend or they just went on with the decision. And this is where we are."Tiger Woods doesn't like the money. "I evaluate that's one of the study issues for all of us that it's not a adjust payout. How great would it be desire in the World Series of Poker at the first tee starting the TOUR Championship that's all you see is it ($10 million) stacked up there and that's what you're playing for? That would create a lot of buzz." [The payout under the current system will be held in escrow.]Ernie agreed with Tiger. "We've grown apart from each other because of these big decisions that were made without the real knowledge of the players." Steve Stricker said. "Personally. I don't desire it. It's a lot of golf in a short amount of measure. I do like the end of the season that it's in the middle of September where if you play well enough you don't have to follow for your card." ()Apparently no one has anything good to say about the FedEx Cup or Tim Finchem or it hasn't been reported by the major media outlets. Meanwhile. Finchem tried to put his forward amidst all the criticism. It sounds to me like there was just a communication breakdown when it came measure to discuss these issues. I ingeminate an article from golfchannel com "For as much as Els complained about the lack of communication it's not alter who's responsible for the breakdown. Players rarely attend meetings or read the "green sheet," a weekly bulletin the TOUR leaves in their lockers and e-mails to them. At a mandatory players' meeting at the Wachovia Championship more than half of them left early."Who knows? Maybe next year they'll bring home the bacon out all these kinks. "Perhaps its measure for the Tour to rethink institutionalizing certain obligations to compete even if this means abandoning or modifying the "independent contractor" copy that has long ruled its relationship with the players. The common wisdom is that the Tour's star players dictate the terms of this relationship. I evaluate this is nonsense. No player is larger than the game larger than the journey. After all where else are these guys going to play?"construe more:http://golfculture blogspot com/ edare you kidding? where else ordain they compete? the re-create is already being set - "world" tournaments are becoming larger and more impactful - the european journey is a great tour as the recent rider cup trashings have proven guys like norman are waiting to pounch again - it is just a matter of measure for the pga model itself to become a dinosaur - when tiger phil furyk and a few others go away going the way that gary player paved and ernie retief sergio et al go now watch the ratings for many of the pga contend's plummet and then purses - remember the guys mentioned don't really be the purses as much as the be and file - they make it in endorsements align biz and in appearance fees outside the U. S. Wake up Tim start wising up and dealing with these guys - they don't need you and they just dissed you big time!! Tiger has previously made thinly veiled threats to not be concerned with journey 'membership'. The top players could play in the majors and then cherry pick a few PGA tournaments to play under support's exemptions. This is what Tiger alluded to. Does anyone think that if a tournament sponsor had arranged for TW to compete in that manner (as a non-tour member) that the journey could say no to that? They would suffer that support. The tour has less power than it appears - it is beholden first to the sponsors who pay of the bills. Then the players without whom it has no product. The top players are incredibly important in this copy. The general public knows who Tiger and Phil are. However few non-golfers know Steve Stricker from Rory Sabbatini from Jim Furyk. Because of this imbalance in power there is absolutely no way the tour can cast aside the independent contractor model for the top players. God only knows why it is taking so long for people to grasp that Finchem should never have been made the czar in the first place. Every move he's made has been to cater either to the TV networks or to focus groups who go up with retarded moves. He could have used his charge to stop the "women on the mens tour" he didn't. He could have stopped the Michelle Wie nonsense he didn't. He could undergo said the play-off concept was dumb he didn't. He is an absolute jelly-fish when it comes to leading. I'm waiting for the day when a cerebrate group suggests to him that the entire cover should be lit for night compete so the leaders can tee off at 5pm and end at 10pm at night. We be a commissioner that knows how to say "no".

A Florida adjudicate has ruled the lethal injection death of convicted murderer Angel Diaz was "painless and humane" and objected to allegations it had been botched. The adjudicate has also lifted a stay of execution for Ocala death row inmate Ian Deco Lightbourne. Lightbourne brought the allegations about Diaz's execution in part to halt his own proceeding. The judge acknowledged "irregularities" in the execution but said the Department of Corrections has addressed and taken appropriate challenge to decrease the risk of those happening in the future.

A Florida judge has ruled the lethal injection death of convicted murderer Angel Diaz was "painless and humane" and objected to allegations it had been botched. The adjudicate has also lifted a stay of execution for Ocala death row inmate Ian Deco Lightbourne. Lightbourne brought the allegations about Diaz's execution in part to stop his own proceeding. The adjudicate acknowledged "irregularities" in the execution but said the Department of Corrections has addressed and taken allot action to decrease the assay of those happening in the future.

A Florida adjudicate has ruled the lethal injection death of convicted murderer Angel Diaz was "painless and humane" and objected to allegations it had been botched. The judge has also lifted a stay of execution for Ocala death row inmate Ian Deco Lightbourne. Lightbourne brought the allegations about Diaz's execution in part to stop his own proceeding. The judge acknowledged "irregularities" in the execution but said the Department of Corrections has addressed and taken appropriate action to reduce the risk of those happening in the future.

A Florida adjudicate has ruled the lethal injection death of convicted murderer Angel Diaz was "painless and humane" and objected to allegations it had been botched. The judge has also lifted a be of execution for Ocala death row inmate Ian Deco Lightbourne. Lightbourne brought the allegations about Diaz's execution in part to halt his own proceeding. The adjudicate acknowledged "irregularities" in the execution but said the Department of Corrections has addressed and taken allot challenge to decrease the assay of those happening in the future.

Here's a story where no one comes out looking good. The story is telecommunications reform in South Africa. The cast is the ruling party the government rapacious foreign investors a hapless under-resourced regulator a well-paid change unionist as come up as "comrades" who were allowed to enrich themselves in the create of black economic empowerment (BEE). Robert Horwitz and Willie Currie cerebrate in a detailed analysis which includes interviews with some of the key players that 10 years on reform has largely failed. The key failure was to privatise before liberalising the authors say in Another dilate Where Privatisation Trumped Liberalisation: The Politics of Telecommunications Reform in South Africa -- A 10-Year Retrospective. Reform mostly created huge profits for Telkom's shareholders notably SBC and Malaysia Telekom at the expense of the wider economy. "Telkom granted a five-year period of exclusivity to grow the network has used its monopoly cater to thwart competition. It has raised prices so high as to be damaging to the economy." The inform says that privatisation in South Africa has taken place in a political environment distinguished by the ANC's project to create a national black bourgeoisie through BEE. "The otherwise laudable goal of spreading economic opportunity and power to previously disenfranchised black South Africans coalesced with ANC [African National Congress] efforts to displace comrades in the commanding heights of the economy and correspondingly a small be of well-connected comrades manoeuvring for study clout in the business world. Trade unionist Tlhalefang Sekano of the Communications Workers' Union was one of the leaders "romanced" (in the words of United States telecommunications giant SBC chief Jim Myers). This was seen as key to getting change union support for the move sale of Telkom. Sekano later became executive chairperson of the CWU Investment Company a member of the board of Ucingo which held 3% of Telkom's shares for a measure and a board member of Telkom earning R96 000 in fees annually between 2001 and 2004. The government is criticised for both being policymaker and investor looking to do come up from selling a stake in Telkom. It also did not provide adequate resources to Icasa for it to do its work. Examples of ministerial interference consider the intervention in Satra's (precursor to Icasa) affect to award a third cellphone licence in 2000 the cancellation of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa's (Icasa) compose regulations on interconnection that same year and pressure on Icasa to approve Telkom tariff hikes in 2002 in request to defend the value of the company's shares as the government embarked on a public offering of shares. The regulator has been largely sabotaged by the government in move due to the consequences of the haste to privatise in part because the ANC leadership has been loath to trust democratic structures outside of its immediate control the authors say. "In bunco. South African telecommunications has been a sector plagued by poor policy and monopolistic behaviour." The inform says based on an converse with Myers who headed SBC's South African operations that when SBC realised it was the only player left in the strategic equity partner bidding apply it temporarily transferred its entire San Antonio corporate legal aggroup to South Africa to help draft the Telecommunications Act to make sure the legislation fitted its requirements. Thintana signed a shareholders' agreement with the government that bound the government to terms rather favourable to the company. "That enter has never been released publicly -- its contents be unknown change surface to the regulator," says the report. SBC (now merged into AT&T) controlled Telkom by restructuring the key management committees and exercising voting supremacy within them. Myers told the authors that the shareholders' agreement was never made public because some of its provisions move the government so stringently and gave Thintana so much control that had they become public knowledge it would have raised huge outcry. "Clauses in the shareholders' agreement stipulated that once the Telecommunications Act was in place neither Telkom nor Thintana would be compelled to follow any legislation that violated the shareholders' agreement," the report says. Telkom's annual reports show that the company paid Thintana a management fee of about R260-million a year in the lay years of its exclusivity period representing about 16% to 17% of Telkom's net profit. Telkom spent billions installing new lines but its "high prices for installation rental and calls (and sociologically inappropriate billing mechanisms in rural areas) resulted in the disconnection of the vast majority of the new lines". While still director general of the Department of Communications. Andile Ngcaba devised a strategy to bid for Thintana's shares if and when they came available. Myers told the authors.